How does the statement about Rachel Hunter in a camouflage outfit function rhetorically?

The characterization of Rachel Hunter in a camouflage outfit functions rhetorically as an appeal to ridicule by using humor or mockery to highlight a particular point or critique. This approach draws attention to the incongruity of the situation, suggesting that her choice of attire might seem comical or out of place in a context where camouflage is not the norm, which can provoke a lighthearted or dismissive reaction from the audience.

Creating a visual image that engenders laughter or skepticism serves to undermine the perceived seriousness or credibility of the subject being discussed. By casting a well-known figure like Rachel Hunter in such an unusual outfit, the statement invites the audience to focus on the absurdity of the image rather than engaging deeply with the underlying issue, thereby using ridicule effectively to shape public perception or opinion.