In the example where Dole critiques Clinton’s speech by comparing it to "the horns of a steer," which appeal does this represent?

The critique made by Dole, where he compares Clinton’s speech to "the horns of a steer," illustrates an appeal to ridicule. This rhetorical strategy uses humor, sarcasm, or ridicule to undermine the opposing argument or position. By making such a comparison, Dole is not only suggesting that Clinton's speech is misguided or absurd, but he is also evoking an image that is meant to provoke laughter or disdain in the audience.

This approach is effective in political discourse because it can diminish the credibility of the opponent's argument in the eyes of the audience, leading them to view Clinton's message as less serious or worthy of respect. The use of a vivid and somewhat humorous metaphor serves to emphasize Dole's disdain and positions his critique in a way that engages the audience on an emotional level, making them more receptive to his perspective. Thus, the engagement through ridicule allows Dole to convey his message while also appealing to the audience's sense of humor.