What argument technique is used when stating that a product is necessary for maintaining health challenges?

The argument technique that involves stating that a product is necessary for dealing with health challenges is effectively captured by the concept of Passing from the Acceptable to the Dubious. This technique occurs when an argument starts with a premise that is widely accepted and then transitions to a claim or assertion that is less substantiated or dubious.

In this case, the necessity of maintaining health is a widely accepted principle; however, claiming that a specific product is essential for this purpose may lack sufficient evidence or rely on assumptions that are not universally agreed upon. This transition can create a persuasive but potentially misleading argument, as it suggests that without the product, one cannot manage health challenges, thereby shifting the discussion from a reasonable point about health maintenance to an exaggerated claim about the product's role.

Recognizing this technique is crucial for critically evaluating arguments presented in advertising or public discourse, as it illuminates how claims can be constructed to influence opinion or behavior based on a blend of accepted and dubious premises.