What type of appeal is represented when a worker argues, "I'm working as hard as I can right now, but with a little more financial help I will be able to cut down my outside work and produce even more"?

The correct choice reflects a logical approach to persuasion focused on outcomes and benefits. In this case, the worker is highlighting the practical consequences of receiving financial assistance. By articulating that additional funding would enable them to reduce outside work, they present a clear cause-and-effect scenario—that more support would directly lead to increased productivity. This appeal hinges on the idea that providing financial help will yield better results, thus making it a pragmatic argument aimed at swaying the audience’s decision based on tangible benefits.

The other options do not fit this scenario. An appeal to flattery would prioritize compliments to influence the audience rather than presenting a rationale based on practical outcomes. A folksy appeal typically relies on relatable or down-to-earth sentiments to connect with the audience but doesn’t emphasize results. Lastly, a join the bandwagon appeal encourages people to act based on the popularity of an idea or action rather than discussing its practical implications. Thus, the answer focuses on how financial support can lead to a more productive outcome, making it the most fitting option.