When a political candidate promises to address community flooding issues, what appeal is primarily being utilized?

The correct answer is the appeal to practical consequences. This type of appeal focuses on the tangible outcomes that a candidate's policies or actions would produce. When a political candidate addresses community flooding issues, they are directly responding to a pressing practical concern that affects the lives and livelihoods of constituents. By promising to resolve such issues, the candidate is emphasizing the real-world benefits of their proposed solutions, making it relatable and relevant to voters who experience the consequences of flooding.

In contrast, other types of appeals, such as prestige or bargain appeals, tend to focus on reputation or value propositions rather than addressing concrete community problems. A negative consequence appeal would hinge on warning constituents about what might happen if action is not taken, rather than proactively solving the issue at hand. The focus here is clearly on the positive and practical outcomes of addressing flooding, illustrating why the appeal to practical consequences is the most fitting choice in this context.