When a proposal is dismissed by trivializing it rather than debating its merits, which fallacy is being employed?

When a proposal is dismissed by trivializing it instead of engaging with its actual merits, the fallacy at play is an appeal to ridicule. This fallacy involves mocking or belittling an idea, suggesting that it is so absurd or silly that it doesn't deserve serious consideration or discussion. By focusing on ridicule instead of providing logical arguments against the proposal, the position avoids addressing the substance of the argument and instead relies on a dismissive tone. This approach can undermine genuine debate and prevent a thorough examination of the pros and cons of the proposal.

In contrast, proposals can be undermined in various ways, but ridicule specifically targets the value of the proposal by suggesting it is laughable, rather than critiquing its underlying logic or reasoning. By highlighting the proposal’s perceived absurdity, the argument shifts away from reasoned discussion, which can hinder productive discourse.