Which appeal involves questioning the worth of a risky action by referencing negative consequences faced by others?

The appeal that centers on questioning the worth of a risky action by referencing negative consequences faced by others is known as the Appeal to Practical Consequences. This form of argument highlights the potential negative outcomes that may arise from a decision or action, thereby creating caution by showcasing real-life examples of what went wrong for others. By focusing on these consequences, it aims to persuade individuals to reconsider their choices based on the desire to avoid similar pitfalls.

In contrast, the other appeals focus on different aspects. The Folksy Appeal seeks to connect with the audience by using relatable, down-to-earth language and examples, often invoking everyday experiences. The Join the Bandwagon Appeal encourages individuals to adopt a belief or take an action simply because others are doing so, leveraging social proof rather than logical reasoning. The Appeal to Ridicule attempts to undermine an argument by mocking or belittling it, rather than engaging with the substantive consequences of an action. Each of these alternatives works on different persuasive strategies but does not specifically address the negative consequences encountered by others, which is the hallmark of the Appeal to Practical Consequences.