Which appeal is being employed by a candidate differentiating themselves based on military service?

The appeal being employed by a candidate who differentiates themselves based on military service is an appeal to prejudice. This type of appeal leverages existing biases or stereotypes that voters may hold, suggesting that military experience makes a candidate more qualified, trustworthy, or capable. It taps into a common positive sentiment about military service within society, which can evoke a favorable response from the audience based on their own beliefs or assumptions about veterans and service members.

For instance, when a candidate emphasizes their military background, they may be invoking a shared societal respect for the sacrifices and discipline associated with service in the armed forces. This can create an emotional resonance with voters who value patriotism or have a prejudice in favor of military personnel, thereby influencing their decision-making in the political context.

When considering the incorrect options, an appeal to authority relies on citing someone in a position of power or expertise to support an argument, which does not necessarily relate to emphasizing military service as a unique qualification. An appeal to fear would involve instilling fear or anxiety about potential threats or consequences, which is not relevant here. Lastly, an appeal to pity seeks to evoke sympathy for an individual’s plight, which doesn't align with the context of leveraging military service for differentiation.