Which persuasion method involves making comparisons between normal and extreme situations?

The method described involves analyzing argumentation by contrasting what is considered acceptable or normal with what is seen as extreme or dubious. This approach helps to highlight the potential flaws or absurdities of an argument by demonstrating how a situation can escalate when taken to an extreme, which can often lead to a rejection of the more extreme viewpoint as unreasonable.

In this context, "Passing from the Acceptable to the Dubious" effectively illustrates how shifting the baseline of comparison can influence perception and supports the validity of arguments. By doing this, the argument becomes more relatable and easier to understand, allowing audiences to evaluate the implications of adopting certain beliefs or actions based on these comparisons.

This method contrasts with other options that utilize different strategies for persuasion, such as appealing to social consensus or emphasizing practical outcomes without necessarily making direct comparisons between extremes.