Which persuasive method is demonstrated through threats of financial loss to a storeowner regarding the "protective association"?

The persuasive method demonstrated through threats of financial loss is the Appeal to Practical Consequences. This technique focuses on the tangible outcomes that can arise from a particular action or decision. In this case, threatening a storeowner with financial loss highlights the practical implications and consequences of not complying with the demands related to the "protective association."

By framing the argument in terms of practical outcomes, the persuader aims to instill fear or concern over potential negative impacts on the storeowner's financial wellbeing. This often encourages individuals to take specific actions or make decisions based on a desire to avoid unfavorable outcomes, showcasing a pragmatic approach to persuasion that prioritizes real-world effects over emotional appeals or societal status.

This persuasive method is effective because it directly connects the argument to the audience's personal stake, making the consequences not just hypothetical but very real and relevant to their situation.