Which persuasive strategy focuses on consequences in the appeal made by the games sponsor?

The choice that focuses on consequences in the appeal made by the games sponsor is indeed the appeal to practical consequences. This strategy emphasizes the real-world implications or outcomes of a particular action or belief, encouraging the audience to consider how adopting a certain viewpoint may affect them practically.

In this context, the games sponsor likely uses this strategy to persuade participants or supporters by illustrating the benefits or drawbacks that could result from their involvement or stance on the games. For instance, they might highlight how participating in these games could lead to enhanced skills, opportunities for recognition, or other tangible rewards. This approach is effective because it directly relates to the audience's interests and needs, making the message more relatable and convincing.

Other strategies, while important in persuasive communication, do not exclusively emphasize consequences. Logical fallacies may undermine an argument by misrepresenting facts or using faulty reasoning rather than focusing on actual outcomes. Emotional appeals tap into feelings rather than practical implications. Coercive arguments may introduce pressure or intimidation rather than a reasoned consideration of consequences. Thus, the appeal to practical consequences stands out as the most relevant strategy in the context of explaining the sponsor's appeal.