Which persuasive technique is employed when a politician promises security and better jobs in their campaign?

The correct answer, which identifies the persuasive technique used when a politician promises security and better jobs during their campaign, is connected to appealing to what is perceived as acceptable but might not be fully justified. This technique revolves around presenting promises that resonate with the audience's desires and fears. Politicians often leverage such promises to secure votes by creating a sense of trust and aligning themselves with the needs and aspirations of the constituents.

In this context, the promises for security and jobs ideally aim to reassure the public and instill a sense of hope for the future. This tactic does not rely on emotional manipulation or circumstantial disadvantages, which would characterize appeals to pity or prejudice. Instead, it offers a surface-level agreement that fits within the audience's current beliefs or desires, prompting them to accept the proposed solutions, even if they might be more complex or less substantiated in reality.

Thus, this method effectively manipulates the audience's expectations, fostering an environment where the promises seem not only relevant but also necessary for addressing their concerns about economic stability and security, leading them to trust the politician's claims without comprehensive scrutiny.