Which persuasive technique is used when appealing to the emotions of a person regarding a homeless child?

The choice of Appeal to Pity is significant because it specifically targets the emotional response of the audience to inspire empathy and sympathy. When discussing a homeless child, this technique seeks to evoke feelings of compassion and sorrow, encouraging the audience to recognize the child's plight and motivate them to take action or support for the cause. This emotional engagement is powerful and often used in persuasive communication to elicit a strong reaction and drive individuals to respond positively, such as donating or advocating for change.

In contrast, the other techniques do not align as closely with invoking emotional responses based on empathy. The Appeal to Prejudice taps into existing biases rather than fostering sympathy for an individual case. Appeal to Practical Consequences might address logical outcomes rather than emotional responses. The option of No Technique implies a lack of strategy, which would not be effective in persuading someone when dealing with a deeply emotional subject like homelessness. Thus, Appeal to Pity is the most fitting technique for triggering the desired emotional engagement in this context.