Which strategy is aimed at creating negative feelings towards an opponent's proposal?

The strategy that focuses on creating negative feelings towards an opponent's proposal is centered on appealing to prejudice. This tactic involves invoking preconceived notions, stereotypes, or biases held by the audience to foster a sense of animosity or distrust toward the opponent’s viewpoint. By aligning the opponent's proposal with negative attributes or associations that resonate with the audience’s biases, this approach effectively undermines the credibility of the message and generates emotional opposition.

In contrast, appealing to pity is based on evoking sympathy rather than fostering negativity, while an appeal to practical consequences focuses on the tangible outcomes of a proposal rather than emotions. An appeal to prestige centers on the status or authority of the source rather than attacking the opposing argument. Thus, the essence of the correct answer lies in its capacity to leverage societal biases to discredit an opponent’s stance.