Which type of argument is the assertion that "some people like to loiter in malls?"

The assertion that "some people like to loiter in malls" is an example of passing from the acceptable to the dubious because it presents a statement that seems reasonable at first glance but leads to a conclusion that is not necessarily substantiated.

This statement makes a general observation about behavior that many might agree with, which is the "acceptable" aspect. However, it implies a broader assertion about the implications of loitering, potentially leading to dubious conclusions about social behavior, safety, or consumerism in malls without supporting evidence. This technique often involves making assumptions based on general behavior without sufficient evidence to validate those assumptions. Thus, the nature of the claim embodies the risk of drawing dubious conclusions based on an initially acceptable premise.